Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rodriguez, et al. v. St. Luke's Hospital, et al.
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Diego Rodriguez, Levi Anderson, Marissa Anderson and others
Defendant:
St Lukes Hospital, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Dave Jeppesen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jayshawn R. Allen v. Deputy Roxann Accuna et al
as 2:2023cv10060
Plaintiff:
Dominique Ortiz, Jayshawn R. Allen, D. T. and others
Defendant:
Co of Los Angeles, Javier Ochoa, roxann acuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Roberson v. Gonzales
as 1:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Maurice V. Roberson
Defendant:
Roxanne Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
