Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jonathan Aceves et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aceves, Crystal Aceves and Evelyn Aceves
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Scott Smith and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv02187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressler v. Nevada Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2019cv00494
Defendant:
Ben Reed, Jr., A. Carrol, D. Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Pressler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briah v. Washington County Oregon
as 3:2019cv00389
Plaintiff:
Raziel Briah and Scott Smith
Defendant:
Washington County Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01653
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woolery v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2017cv06786
Plaintiff:
John Woolery
Defendant:
City Of Concord, Concord Police Department, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 1:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Overstreet
as 3:2016cv00516
Defendant:
Siri Overstreet
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Edward Sialoi, et al v. City of San Diego, et al
as 14-55387
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD SIALOI, KELLI SIALOI, FOLENI SIALOI and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ALLEN SLUSS, BRADLEY PHELPS and others
W. Hulstedt, et al v. Richard Slavin, et al
as 12-16776
Plaintiff - Appellee:
W. ERIC HULSTEDT, Permanent Guardian and Permanent Conservator of David Hulstedt, and adult, D.H., WALTER HULSTEDT and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, Arizona
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD SLAVIN, JAMES DORER, DEVEN FELLOWS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
