Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Richard Jackson et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09438
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JACKSON, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin Hart v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 23-15858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN HART
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC., VIVEK MURTHY, in his official capacity as United States Surgeon General and others
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 3:2023cv05788
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hart v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Justin Hart
Defendant:
Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc., Vivek Murthy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Morgan v. Twitter Inc
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Glen Morgan
Defendant:
Twitter Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Darnell Hicks v. Floyd Bradford, III, et al
as 23-55059
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARNELL HICKS
Defendant / Appellant:
FLOYD S. BRADFORD III
Defendant:
ELIZABETH STRUMP, IAN MILES CHEONG, LAKEWOOD CA REGIONAL CRIME AWARENESS, PREVENTION AND SAFETY GROUP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
