Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. The Magic Rose et al
as 2:2024cv06301
Defendant:
Empowering Unlimited Potential, Ibiza, Wendys Deals and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carrillo v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Homesite Insurance, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sheila Halousek v. Verizon
as 23-16101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA HALOUSEK
Defendant / Appellee:
VERIZON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
