Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wilson v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv01076
Defendant:
Darby Fitzgerald Hertz, Brian Earl Watson, Jami Caroline Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Michael Wilson v. Florida Department of Revenue, et al
as 15-16164
Defendant / Appellee:
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, NANCY TERREL, JONATHON ORTEGA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA HEATH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Wilson v. Florida Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2014cv04726
Defendant:
Brian Earl Watson, Jessica Elizabeth Buss, Adan Cardenas, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Potts, et al v. Brian Stiger, et al
as 10-17633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL L. POTTS and THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN STIGER, in his official capacity as Director, California Department of Consumer Affairs, RICHARD DECUIR, Executive Officer, California Dental Board, JOHN BETTINGER, D.D.S., President and others
Potts, et al v. Hamilton, et al
as 2:2003cv00348
Plaintiff:
Michael L Potts and American Academy of Implant Dentistry
Defendant:
Kathleen Hamilton, Cynthia Gatlin, Alan Kaye and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry
Intervenor:
Lawrence Addleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
