Cases 101 - 110 of 12,526
Hubley v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05268
Plaintiff:
Asil Leon Hubley
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Washington State Health Services Management, Morris Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Maneses et al
as 3:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
Darrick L Hunter
Defendant:
Jilma Maneses, David Flynn, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Bodhi
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.J.E. v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05261
Plaintiff:
S.J.E.
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Cheryl Strange, Rob Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Neal et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Harris
Defendant:
Monique Neal, Jocelyn Cooney, Jaymie Parkhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05259
Petitioner:
Ramil A Serrano
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
