Cases 131 - 140 of 617
Goff #186716 v. Kimble et al
as 2:2020cv01392
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Rode, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Rode et al
as 2:2020cv01284
Defendant:
Unknown Diaz, Anthony Coleman, Unknown Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fenty et al v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv01192
Plaintiff:
Puente Human Rights Movement, Douglas Crough, Brian Stepter and others
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bells v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2020cv00257
Defendant:
Barbara Von Blanckensee, Anthony Gallion, S Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pinson et al v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2020cv00237
Petitioner:
Jimmy Malone, Jonah Garza, Edwin Wike and others
Respondent:
Barbara Von Blanckensee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James #134805 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00989
Plaintiff:
Tyrue Lamar James
Defendant:
Donna Mendoza, Anthony R Coleman, Luis Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff #186716 v. Thomson et al
as 2:2020cv00853
Defendant:
Unknown Thomson, Unknown Kaufman, Unknown Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Charles Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhone #245225 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00885
Petitioner:
David Anthony Rhone
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wheeler v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 4:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gehon #305228 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00685
Respondent:
David Shinn, Arizona, State of and Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry
Petitioner:
Anthony Greg Gehon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
