Cases 151 - 160 of 231,329
Bailey #361996 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Leon Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grewal #338078 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Petitioner:
Avtar Singh Grewal
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, K. Mixon, M. Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bousley v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bousley
Defendant:
Garcia and Director of Nursing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Brown v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Terence Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Hernandez, Mekhi Mendoza, Cesar Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Luper
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Tholson
Defendant:
D. Luper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twiss #359160 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Twiss
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Party, Unknow Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery #301029 v. Morales et al
as 2:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Curtis Montgomery
Defendant:
Heather Morales, Mesa Police Department, Michael Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
