Cases 11 - 20 of 413
Hymon v. Holthus et al
as 2:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Mary K. Holthus, Judge Schwartz, C.C.D.C. Sergent Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo A. King v. California State Bar Court et al
as 2:2023cv08239
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. King, II
Defendant:
California State Bar Court, Munoz, Pulitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Gamboa v. Banuelos et al
as 2:2023cv08959
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa
Defendant:
Banuelos, Munoz, Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gamboa v. Banuelos et al
as 1:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa
Defendant:
Banuelos, Munoz, Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. California State Bar Court
as 3:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. King, II
Defendant:
California State Bar Court, Munoz, Pulitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Du Truong Nguyen v. Fidelity Investments et al
as 2:2023cv06600
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments, Ford E. ONeil, Jeffrey Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08444
Plaintiff:
Alex Munoz
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08448
Plaintiff:
Jorge A Munoz
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08482
Plaintiff:
Allen J Munoz
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz #214046 v. Saad et al
as 2:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Albert Munoz
Defendant:
Unknown Saad and Unknown Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
