Cases 11 - 20 of 419
Oldenburg v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Nick Oldenburg
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Little, et al.
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Nick Sutton
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metts v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ben Metts
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruse v. Little, et al.
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
David Cruse
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oberg v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Jacob Oberg
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tena v. Conover et al
as 4:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Laura Conover, Brad S Terrace and Joshua Moser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01369
Petitioner:
Ronald Nelson Chandler
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tena v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Pima, County of, Tucson, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins
Defendant:
Warden Valley, Sergeant Barrows, Governor Brad Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billingsley v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08172
Plaintiff:
Brad S Billingsley
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
