Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 44
(PC) Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. State of Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00283
Defendant: Mychelle Rome, Reba Stevens, Galvin Law Group and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Alexander Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Albright et al
as 2:2018cv00507
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Madeline Albright and U.S. Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Clinton et al
as 2:2018cv00506
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Bill Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Madeline Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Trump et al
as 2:2018cv00236
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Donald Trump, United States Military and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Partners in Recovery LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04622
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Partners in Recovery, Visions of Hope and Maxwell Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2017cv04626
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Maricopa County Superior Court, Unknown Parties and Wendy Morten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2017cv04625
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Crisis Recovery Unit et al
as 2:2017cv04623
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Crisis Recovery Unit, Unknown Parties, Urgent Psychiatric Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Circle K
as 2:2017cv04627
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Circle K
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Akers et al
as 2:2017cv04458
Plaintiff: Audrey Camille Akers
Defendant: Madelyn Joyce Akers, Mt Zion Community Church Charity and Alan Daryl Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?