Cases 11 - 20 of 333
Gino Cervantes v. Shawn Moore
as 2:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Gino Cervantes
Respondent:
Shawn Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Elsen et al
as 3:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Cervantes
Defendant:
Daltizu Elsen, Niloofar Fadaki, Michael L. Meduin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. Nieto et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Enrique Pena Nieto, Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, Jesus Gabriel Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Butler v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Butler
Defendant:
David Robinson, C. Thomas, Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tongi v. Roswell et al
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Kai Tongi
Defendant:
J. Roswell, R. Valine, E. Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Petitioner:
Cosme Castillo Cervantes
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Celaya v. Cervantes et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Arnold Celaya
Defendant:
Cervantes, Ramirez and J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady Harris v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 22-16785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRADY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, Warden, K. ROSE, Correctional Sergeant, J. MUNOZ, Correctional Officer and others
(PC) Cervantes v. Porter et al
as 2:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Raul Valenzuela Cervantes
Defendant:
Porter and Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. USA
as 4:2022cv08658
Petitioner:
Henry Cervantes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
