Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jenkins v. Kay last name unknown
as 3:2018cv05049
Plaintiff:
Sidney Donald Jenkins, III
Defendant:
Kay last name unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. LNG/King Biz et al
as 2:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Dickerson, Jr
Defendant:
LNG/King Biz, The Last Donor Networks Inc, Worldwide Legit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Hendrix v. State of Nevada, et al
as 14-16501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, Ex Rel (NDOC), ROHAN, C/O, O'BARR, C/O and others
Brodsky v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv01064
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Brodsky
Defendant:
Dr. Holmes, Medical Director, Neven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rimer v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00889
Defendant:
Linda Adams, Dr. Romeo Aranas, Dr. Joyce Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wootten v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv05828
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wootton
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Karr, Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Wallace v. Wesley Smith, et al
as 11-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON MORRIS WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY SMITH, Dr., Individually and in his official capacity, JOHN C. COOPER, SUSAN R. BOLTON and others
Danny Atterbury v. Katie Cooper, et al
as 10-15578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY ATTERBURY
Defendant - Appellee:
KATIE COOPER, GWEN LAST NAME UNKNOWN, MIKE STOLP and others
Dozier v. Neven et al
as 2:2008cv00625
Plaintiff:
Esau Dozier
Defendant:
Dwight Neven, Nevada Department Of Corrections, Mark Las Name Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. Foulk et al
as 3:2007cv06256
Plaintiff:
Danny Atterbury
Defendant:
Ed Foulk, Mike Stolp, Katie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
