Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Hendrix v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2018cv05465
Plaintiff:
Royce Hendrix
Defendant:
Tim Thrasher, Douglas French, Dan White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrance Irby v. State of Washington, et al
as 18-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, BERNARD EDWARD WARNER, DAN PACHOLKE and others
Krona v. WSP et al
as 4:2017cv05097
Plaintiff:
Marvin Krona
Defendant:
WSP, Belanger, Duede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patu v. Albert et al
as 2:2017cv00728
Plaintiff:
Ricky Pila Patu
Defendant:
Sheryl Albert, WSP Medical Staff and Washington State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Silva v. Donald Holbrook
as 17-35181
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW G. SILVA
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent
Charles Longshore v. Robert Herzog, et al
as 16-35707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES S. LONGSHORE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HERZOG, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, JOHN CAMPBELL and others
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 15-35668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 14-35823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
John Chavers v. Holbrook, et al
as 13-36142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. CHAVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendant, STEVE HAMMOND, WSP Medical Director, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY and others
Garland v. Jacobsen et al
as 4:2013cv04779
Plaintiff:
Thomas Garland
Defendant:
D. Jacobsen, S. Risenhoover, M. McLean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
