Cases 21 - 30 of 33
John Stewart v. King County Jail, et al
as 09-35900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. STEWART
Defendant:
KING COUNTY JAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY, REED HOLTGEERTS, Jail Director, DAVID FLEMING, Director of Public Health and others
Gregorio Funtanilla, Jr. v. David Tristan, et al
as 09-17180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORIO C. FUNTANILLA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TRISTAN, J. S. BLOXOM, T. J. GODIN and others
Keiper v. Washington State Trial Judges et al
as 2:2009cv01019
Plaintiff:
Owen Walter Keiper
Defendant:
Washington State Trial Judges, Washington State Prosecutors, Kathryn Bail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tai Dang v. D. Sisto
as 08-16970
Petitioner - Appellant:
TAI Q. DANG
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden
Si Dang v. Scott Kernan
as 08-16968
Petitioner - Appellant:
SI VAN DANG
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT M. KERNAN, Warden
Herman Johnson v. Dang, et al
as 08-16168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN T. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DANG, JONES, MEDICAL TRAINED ASSISTANT and others
USA v. Nathan Dang
as 08-55386
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHAN DANG, a/k/a Seal C, a/k/a Nghia Van Dang
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 08-15491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Wilks v. Stowers et al
as 2:2007cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
Vernette Stowers, T. Hansen, Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Dang v. USA
as 8:2007cv01242
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathan Dang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
