Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 419
Valdez v. Roehm et al.
as 4:2023cv05102
Plaintiff: Gabriel Valdez
Defendant: Brittnie E Roehm, Eric Eisinger, Brad Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Egan v. Weinreb et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01307
Petitioner: Michael P. Egan
Respondent: Brad A. Weinreb and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Inslee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05604
Plaintiff: John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant: Jay R Inslee, Cheryl Strange, Robert Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall Chirrick v. Brad Cain
as 23-35448
Petitioner / Appellant: RANDALL S. CHIRRICK
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Inst.
Darren Pollock v. Brad Cain
as 23-35387
Petitioner / Appellant: DARREN POLLOCK
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN
Ernie Perez v. Brad Cain
as 23-35373
Petitioner / Appellant: ERNIE JUNIOR PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctioanl Institution
Perkins et al v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff: Daniel Perkins, Nick Oldenburg, Michael East and others
Defendant: Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Member and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Valley et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Petitioner: Michael A Collins
Respondent: Warden Valley, Sargent Barrows, Brad Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Clark v. Brad Cain
as 23-35333
Petitioner / Appellant: JEFFREY MARK CLARK
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN
Rand Codon v. Brad Cain
as 23-35290
Petitioner / Appellant: RAND MAURICE CODON
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?