Cases 21 - 30 of 274
Peterson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez, et al
as 23-15306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden, CHRISTENSEN, Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35099
Petitioner / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Sivak v. Winmill, et al.
as 1:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Respondent:
Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye, M. Douglas Harpool and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Hayes v. The Entity, et al
as 23-35002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
THE ENTITY, (IDOC), TIMOTHY R. MCKAY, DAVID E. DIETZ and others
Jody Carr v. David Nye, et al
as 22-36052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID C. NYE, Judge, B. LYNN WINMILL, Judge, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC and others
Zaragosa-Solis v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis
Defendant:
M Gutierrez, Unknown Christensen, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hayes v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
IDOC, Jay Christensen, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
