Cases 21 - 30 of 1,145
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Flores v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv01587
Petitioner:
Felix Nacedo Flores
Respondent:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Brown v. Flores et al
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
Hameed J. Brown
Defendant:
Flores, Colledge and While
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sgt. Hampton et al
as 3:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
Michael Lenior Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Hampton, C/O Flores and C/O Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Leon Marcus Smith v. Captain Flores
as 5:2023cv02220
Petitioner:
Derek Leon Marcus Smith
Respondent:
Captain Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McGee v. Flores-Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Isaish McGee
Defendant:
G. Flores-Lopez, C. Rehkopf and A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McGee v. Flores-Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv02406
Plaintiff:
Isaish McGee
Defendant:
G. Flores-Lopez, C. Rehkopf and A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert Claudio
Defendant:
PIA Industries Inc., Bierbaum, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Romeo #266244 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv02153
Plaintiff:
James Elliott Romeo
Defendant:
David Shinn, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown McAdorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Wharton et al
as 2:2023cv02017
Petitioner:
Javier Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
Lawrence M Wharton, Allen H Quist, Ken Volkmen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
