Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Smith v. Mack et al
as 4:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Smith
Defendant:
R. Mack, R.T.C. Grounds, G. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bright et al
as 4:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Jackson
Defendant:
D. Bright, R. Delgado, L. Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornberry v. Ahmed et al
as 4:2012cv06129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Thornberry
Defendant:
Z. Ahmed, Laurie Hedden, G. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gustavo McKenzie v. G. Ellis, et al
as 12-56841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. ELLIS, Sergeant, JOHN MITCHELL, M. VORISE and others
Lopez v. Spearman et al
as 5:2012cv04554
Plaintiff:
David Lopez
Defendant:
M. E. Spearman, J. Clark, M. Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 5:2012cv02769
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Doyle
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, M. Sepulveda, G. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reyes v. Grounds et al
as 3:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jaimez Reyes
Defendant:
R. Grounds, G. Ellis, M. Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marroquin v. Helen et al
as 3:2012cv00617
Plaintiff:
Edgar Marroquin
Defendant:
Helen, Jenny, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrys v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation Dental Department et al
as 3:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Jesse Aaron Andrys
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation Dental Department, C. Fransdal, W. J. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustavo McKenzie v. G. Ellis, et al
as 12-55198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. ELLIS, Sergeant, JOHN MITCHELL, M. VORISE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.