Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Maney et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv00570
Plaintiff:
Paul Maney, Theron Hall, Sheryl Lynn Sublet and others
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, Colette Peters, Rob Persson and others
Amicus Curiae:
D.O. Michael Puisis, M.D. Robert Cohen and M.D. Joseph Goldenson
Interested Party:
Leroy Lamont Wells and Samuel Buchanan
Petitioner:
Bobbin Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garry v. Torress et al
as 3:2020cv00197
Defendant:
Tommy Stephens, Lt. Stroud, Duane Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Remoh Garry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Driver v. Gibson et al
as 2:2020cv00642
Defendant:
J. Garry, Carl Ecklund, Keith Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucus v. Koenig et al
as 5:2019cv07938
Plaintiff:
Jesse David Lucas and Jesse David Lucus
Defendant:
Julie Garry, Kathleen Allison, Warden Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Michael Garcia, Abigail Dillon, Bonnie Dumanis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Garry v. N.D.O.C. Medical Director
as 3:2019cv00238
Plaintiff:
Remoh Garry
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garcia v. Win et al
as 2:2019cv00434
Defendant:
Robert Duncan, Shefanli Awatani, Hla Win and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garry Archey v. John Conant
as 18-35364
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARRY R. ARCHEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN CONANT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01699
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garry v. Eugene Police Department
as 6:2017cv01572
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department
Plaintiff:
Gerome H. Garry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
