Cases 21 - 30 of 406
Demond Brackett v. Wendell Anderson, et al
as 22-16741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND CHARLES BRACKETT
Defendant / Appellee:
WENDELL ANDERSON, Sheriff, BRIAN JON DAVIS, Chief Public Defender, CLINT CURRY, Chief District Attorney and others
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) O'Brien v. Garza et al
as 2:2022cv01730
Defendant:
Portee, R. Garza and Baker
Plaintiff:
Kory T. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
A. Arisco, E. Garza, R. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Lake County Montana et al
as 9:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfredo Garza
Defendant:
Lake County Montana, Bill Barron, Steve Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ballesteros v. Garza
as 1:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Benjamin I. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Garza v. William Hutchings, et al
as 22-16082
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD GARZA
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
(PC)Ballesteros v. Garza
as 1:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Benjamin I. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiante Scott v. Olga Beregovskay, et al
as 22-16064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIANTE DION SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
OLGA BEREGOVSKAY, M.D., A. SHITTU, M.D., Chief Physician & Surgeon, NDUKWE N. ODELUGA, M.D., Chief Med. Executive and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
