Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Sego v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02389
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Correctional Health Services, Inmate Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Inmate Legal Services et al
as 2:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Merrick
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services , Carol Lillie , A Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bass v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Johann Alexander Bass
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services, Inmate Legal Services, J Baumann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Inmate Legal Services
as 2:2011cv02045
Plaintiff:
Naeem Copeland
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flannery v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
Robert Flannery
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Inmate Legal Services, et al
as 2:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services, Joe Arpaio, Timothy Overton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bohl v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Bohl
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services and Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Arpaio, et al
as 2:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hall
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio, 3rd Shift Officer, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Templar v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv02215
Plaintiff:
L S Templar
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Burch & Cracehiolo, P.A., Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01494
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
