Cases 21 - 30 of 663
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv04135
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Barth v. S. Borbe, et al
as 23-15879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DAMON BARTH
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BORBE, Correctional Officer, LOCKWOOD, Correctional Officer, TOURE, Correctional Officer and others
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mona Murillo v. J. Castillo, et al
as 23-15491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONA SALCIDA MURILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CASTILLO, D. LEPE, GARCIA and others
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Medina v. Campbell
as 1:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Cesario Vizcarra Medina
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cesario Medina v. Pitchess Detention Center South Facility, et al
as 23-55109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER SOUTH FACILITY, PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER NORTH FACILITY, MCJ LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, EduardoTomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Ulises Medina
as 22-16941
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ULISES MEDINA, AKA Ulises Manuel Medina
(PC) Medina v. Amador Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Antonio Medina
Defendant:
Amador Jail and Jeremy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
