Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Cesare Redmond v. G. Swarthout
as 13-16095
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESARE REDMOND
Respondent - Appellee:
G. SWARTHOUT
Moshrif v. City of Redmond et al
as 2:2012cv01135
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Moshrif
Defendant:
City of Redmond, State of Washington, King County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Swarthout
as 2:2012cv00169
Petitioner:
Cesare Redmond
Respondent:
G. Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Redmond, Sr. v. Rantz, et al
as 10-35972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD REDMOND, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANTZ, Dr., KOHUT, Dr., EVANS, Dr. and others
Redmond v. Rantz et al
as 6:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Redmond, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Rantz, Dr. Kohut, Dr. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Redmond v. San Francisco Police Departmen, et al
as 10-16436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER RAY REDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, JOSEPH MINNER, S.F. Police Officer #149 and others
Cesare Redmond v. W. Rodriguez, et al
as 10-16105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CESARE REDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
W. A. RODRIGUEZ, Captain, Associate Warden - CSP Solano and J. VALADEZ, Associate Warden, Solano
Walter Redmond v. San Francisco Police Departmen, et al
as 09-16829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER RAY REDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Walter Redmond v. San Francisco Police Departmen, et al
as 09-16772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER RAY REDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Redmond v. San Francisco Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2007cv04988
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Redmond
Defendant:
San Francisco Sheriff's Dept. and City & County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
