Cases 31 - 40 of 453
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos Ovalle v. Orange County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Santos Ovalle
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department, Deputy Martinez, Doctor Holstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Toliver, Dressen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fernandez v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00383
Petitioner:
Santos Arnoldo Fernandez
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santos Cuevas v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANTOS CUEVAS
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, Governor, JESSE WILLIAM BARTON, ELLEN ROSENBLUM and others
Santos Neris Grimaldi v. F.C.I. Gilmer, W. VA et al
as 2:2022cv05425
Petitioner:
Santos Neris Grimaldi
Respondent:
F.C.I. Gilmer, W. VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Santos Cuevas v. Brandon Kelly
as 22-35610
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANTOS CUEVAS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRANDON KELLY
Santos Neris Grimaldi et al v. Dayan V Mathai et al
as 2:2022cv05424
Plaintiff:
Santos Neris Grimaldi and Santos Grimaldi
Defendant:
Dayan V Mathai, Jackie Lacey, Mayra Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
