Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Sterling Beatty v. D. Nevens, et al
as 14-16788
Petitioner - Appellant:
STERLING P. BEATTY
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVENS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Michael Beattie v. Joe McGrath
as 14-56526
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOUIS BEATTIE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE MCGRATH
Beattie v. Romero et al
as 3:2014cv01448
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Beattie
Defendant:
L. Romero, I. Marquez and I. Ugalde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McColm v. Trinity County, et al.
as 2:2014cv00773
Defendant:
Michael Hubbard, Laurie Willis, Trinity County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. McColm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Beattie v. Joe Schmidt, et al
as 13-35813
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS M. BEATTIE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE D. SCHMIDT, Commissioner, SAM EDWARDS, Deputy Commisisoner and CARMEN L. GUTIERREZ, Deputy Commissioner
Beatty v. Nevens et al
as 2:2013cv00764
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden D. Nevens
Petitioner:
Sterling P. Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Del Duca v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01643
Plaintiff:
Jon Amadio Del Duca
Defendant:
State of Washington, King County Jail, Brian Beattie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Del Duca v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01626
Plaintiff:
Jon Amadio Del Duca
Defendant:
State of Washington, King County Jail, Brian Beattie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 4:2012cv02480
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beattie v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Beattie
Defendant:
Joe D. Schmidt , Sam Edwards and Carmen L. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
