Cases 31 - 40 of 289
Zane Floyd v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General
Voss v. Olsen et al
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Steven Floyd Voss
Respondent:
Kyle Olsen, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voss v. Olsen et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Steven Floyd Voss
Defendant:
Kyle Olsen and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roderick Washington v. Jackie Lacey et al
as 2:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Jackie Lacey, Shen Jay Fern, Robert Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Stringer
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Floyd Robert Thomas
Defendant:
B. Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Cain et al
as 2:2021cv01555
Plaintiff:
Floyd Wayne Bell
Defendant:
Brad Cain, Dr. Garth Gulick, Dr. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd Dewaine Scott v. R.C. Johnson
as 2:2021cv08309
Plaintiff:
Floyd Dewaine Scott
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ullrich v. Canyon County, et al.
as 1:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Steven Floyd Ullrich
Defendant:
Canyon County, canyon county Sheriffs office, Canyon County Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sylvester Floyd v. Rick M. Hill
as 2:2021cv05767
Petitioner:
Sylvester Floyd
Respondent:
Rick M. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Floyd v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Linda Fox, Execution Team Members NDOC, David Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Zane M. Floyd
Interested Party:
Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
