Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Poslof v. CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations, et al
as 1:2013cv01935
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, CSATF/SP Corcoran II, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton et al v. Jackson et al
as 3:2012cv05104
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Burton
Defendant:
Pat Glebe, Eric Jackson, Kevin Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Poslof, Sr. v. James Yate
as 10-56786
Petitioner - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden
Lonnie Lee Epps v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2010cv05804
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), Sgt Perris Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Epps
Lewis et al v. Nickels et al
as 2:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis and Lonnie Lee McClure
Defendant:
Greg Nickels, Sandra K., City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Poslof, Sr. v. James Yate
as 09-55686
Petitioner - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden
Manuel v. Hartley
as 1:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Manuel
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, T. Salgado, J Handorf and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lonnie Poslof, Sr. v. Pleasant Valley State Prison, et al
as 09-15605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and DEIAS, LVN
Lonnie Lee Manuel v. T. Salgado et al
as 2:2008cv08578
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Manuel
Defendant:
T. Salgado, J. Handorf and D. A. Clendaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Lonnie Poslof, Sr. v. James Yate
as 08-56882
Petitioner - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
