Cases 31 - 40 of 865
Thomas Wade Robinson v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wade Robinson
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Dr. Mudge, Catherine Leigh Quill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Langley et al
as 6:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Robinson
Defendant:
Capt. Ted Langley, Tina Lovik, Mark Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Moreno v. Jim Robinson
as 23-15453
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE MORENO
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM ROBINSON
Fernandez-Morales v. Gazzini et al
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez-Morales
Defendant:
Gazzini, B. Robinson, Dr Omandac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2023cv08050
Plaintiff:
Melvin H Robinson, Jr. and Melik Q Robinson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Public Safety, Arizona Department of Public Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Zamora v. Cates et al
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Santiago Manuel Zamora
Defendant:
B. Cates, Rodriguez, Banuelos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Zamora v. Cates et al
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Santiago Manuel Zamora
Defendant:
B. Cates, Rodriguez, Banuelos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
Franklin Mackenzie Robinson
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Zamora v. Cates et al
as 2:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Santiago Manuel Zamora
Defendant:
B. Cates, Rodriguez, Banuelos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hugh Robinson v. Acting Warden
as 23-55105
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUGH ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
