Cases 31 - 40 of 63
McCowan v. Seeborg et al
as 3:2015cv04197
Plaintiff:
Vincent Price McCowan
Defendant:
Richard Seeborg, Corinne Lew, Richard W. Wieking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00036
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Richard W. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillingham v. Unit Manager Jovanovich et al
as 6:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Gillingham
Defendant:
Unit Manager Jovanovich and Sgt. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillingham v. Kirkegard
as 9:2014cv00212
Petitioner:
Richard W. Gillingham
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Gurule v. John Hanlin, et al
as 13-36051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EVERETT LEE GURULE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HANLIN, Sheriff, DOUGLAS COUNTY JAIL, DOUGLAS COUNTY, Oregon and others
Gurule v. Hanlin et al
as 6:2013cv01569
Defendant:
Clyde T. Bancroft, Steven A. Blum, Douglas Co. Jail and others
Ued In Their Individual Capacitie:
Conmed Healthcare Inc.
Ued In Their Individual And Official Capacitie:
Douglas Co. Ore.
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Gurule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Gillingham v. Leroy Kirkegard
as 13-35702
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD W. GILLINGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD
Richard Gillingham v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 13-35698
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD W. GILLINGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Tia v. Perkins et al
as 1:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Richard K. Perkins, Ronette Kawakami, Jason Akasaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillingham v. Kirkegard et al
as 9:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
Richard W. Gillingham
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
