Cases 41 - 50 of 1,683
Perez v. Dzuranda et al
as 2:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Angel Arturo Perez
Defendant:
James Dzuranda, Julie Williams, Dean Ontiveras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv07027
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. District Judge Otis D Wright, II, U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(HC) Perez v. Arviza
as 1:2023cv01341
Petitioner:
Yoryi Perez
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08421
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Perez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barkacs v. Bharat et al
as 2:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
James Barkacs
Defendant:
Rattan Bharat, Perez and Martine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios-Perez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08388
Plaintiff:
Aldo Y Rios-Perez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Perez v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
Eddie Perez
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Duncan v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, Clausen, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08423
Plaintiff:
Abraham N Perez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duncan v. Cisneros et al
as 2:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, Clausen, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
