Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Braunstein v. Villani et al
as 3:2012cv00665
Plaintiff:
Steven Braunstein
Defendant:
Drew Christianson, Kathy Hardcastle, Michael Villani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rajiv Shah v. George Christianson
as 12-57280
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAJIV KANTILAL SHAH
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE CHRISTIANSON, Medical Doctor
Rajiv Kantilal Shah v. George Christianson
as 2:2012cv06547
Respondent:
George Christianson
Petitioner:
Rajiv Kantilal Shah
Morgan v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al
as 2:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
James Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, Barbara Broderick, Rochelle Harlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Helm v. Adam Christianson, et al
as 11-17342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LEE HELM
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM CHRISTIANSON, Sheriff, Stanislaus County, CLIFTON, Lt., Facility Commander, Public Safety Center, Stanislaus County, LLOYD, Lt., Facility Commander, Downtown Facility, Stanislaus County and others
Gerardo Pillado v. George Neotti, et al
as 11-55888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARDO PILLADO
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE NEOTTI, Warden, A. COTA, Associate Warden, E. MARRERO, Facility 4 Captain and others
Sitto v. Christianson
as 3:2011cv00268
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sitto
Defendant:
Roger Carl Christianson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillado v. Neotti
as 3:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Pillado
Defendant:
George Neotti, A Cota, E Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Adam Christianson, et al
as 11-15151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM CHRISTIANSON, Sheriff-Coroner, GINA LEGURIA, Policy Manager, WILLIAM DUNCAN, Cpt. and others
Benge v. Weildman et al
as 2:2010cv00254
Plaintiff:
J. Benge
Defendant:
Les Weildman, Adam Christianson and Cantrall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
