Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Rodney Plant v. Spackman, et al
as 14-35133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY L. PLANT
Defendant - Appellee:
SPACKMAN, C/O, SIDWELL, Sgt., KIMMEL, Sgt. and others
Lamont-Goldsby v. Kaschmitter et al
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Andante Lamont-Goldsby
Defendant:
Amanda Kaschmitter, Cathy Richards, JoAnne McPheeters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. County of Gallatin et al
as 2:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gloria Wells
Defendant:
County of Gallatin, Sheriff's Department, Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Bush v. M Block et al
as 5:2013cv01795
Defendant:
Officer M Block, Officer M Block, Seargent Cokesh and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bush and Bush's Towing
Wittmayer v. Yamhill County et al
as 3:2013cv00983
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10, Josh Eckroth, Ron Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Wittmayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney B. Thomas v. BOP
as 5:2013cv00825
Defendant:
Arcola Washington Adduci, Arcola Washington Adduci, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney B Thomas
Michael Lake v. Phillip Foster, et al
as 13-35147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP FOSTER, DEAN ALLEN, DARCELL STAMMER and others
Dorsey v. Fleming et al
as 2:2012cv02258
Plaintiff:
Dennis Earl J. Dorsey, Jr
Defendant:
David Fleming, Ben Sanders and Jane and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neil v. Director of Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv01809
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. A. O'Neil
Defendant:
Director of Department of Corrections, Chief Medical Officer and Jane and John Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2012cv02332
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane Wright
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe 1, Jane or John Doe 2 and Jane or John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
