Cases 41 - 50 of 4,837
Murray v. Parlow et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Patricia Parlow, Lane County DAs Office, Erick Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jewel Dyer
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, Scott S. Harris and Sara Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Erick T. Knapp, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T Knapp, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Shugan et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Kamala H Shugar, Lane County DAs Office, Erick T. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T. Knapp, Lane Count DAs Office, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Corral v. Owens
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Dylan Scott Corral
Defendant:
Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. House of Representatives
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
House of Representatives and Mike Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Katherine Miller, Warren Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. Nago
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Scott T. Nago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
