Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Roy Roybal v. S. Holincik, et al
as 12-55257
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY ROYBAL
Respondent - Appellee:
S. A. HOLINCIK, Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15039
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05613
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Poindexter v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00123
Petitioner:
Joseph Edward Poindexter
Respondent:
Craig Apker, United States Parole Commission, Lee Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Frederick Banks v. D. Smith, et al
as 10-17853
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
D. R. SMITH, Warden FCI Phoenix, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Helgeson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv02479
Petitioner:
Kenneth Helgeson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, D Smith and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv02413
Respondent:
D Smith, United States Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Frederick H Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Collins v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2010cv04679
Petitioner:
Bernest Collins
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, United States Marshal Service and Gregory Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2010cv01179
Defendant:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
