Cases 51 - 60 of 6,689
Canada
as 3:2024cv01412
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helburn et al v. Centurion Health Services of Idaho LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nicholas Helburn
Defendant:
Centurion Health Services of Idaho LLC, Solomon Brothers Inc., Saint Alphonsus Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thayer v. USA
as 2:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Thayer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fitzhugh v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Fitzhugh
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ingmire-Lopez v. Whatcom County Jail
as 2:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Darrell Lee Ingmire-Lopez
Respondent:
Whatcom County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Card v. Oakland Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Oakland Police Department, The Mercury News, Sacramento County Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Baker v. Superior Courts of California
as 2:2024cv00476
Petitioner:
Jamaul Lee Baker
Respondent:
Superior Courts of California and Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canada
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Michael A. Lujan v. Kevin Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Defendant:
Kevin Hixon, Lee, Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
