Cases 51 - 60 of 454
Oscar Gonzalez v. Parker Sampson
as 2:2022cv04072
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gonzalez
Defendant:
Parker Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown #156811 v. Parker et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Patrice E Brown and Patrice Edmond Brown
Defendant:
Amanda Moncayo Parker, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00417
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carlos Hendon v. J. DeFazio, et al
as 22-15359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS DUANE HENDON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DEFAZIO and J. PARKER
(PC)Isamade v. Parker-Wright et al
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Chijioke Isamade
Defendant:
Parker-Wright, Freiedrichs and Solovyev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Bernard Parker v. Craig Koenig et al
as 5:2022cv00323
Petitioner:
Gary Bernard Parker
Respondent:
Craig Koenig and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Binh C. Tran v. Cynthia Y. Tampkins et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Binh C. Tran
Defendant:
Warden Cynthia Y. Tampkins, Chief Deputy Warden Lavelle Parker, Kerry Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Luevano v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jose Luevano
Defendant:
Anthony Jenkins, J. Janam, J. Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Department of Justice Jail et al
as 2:2021cv02056
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Department of Justice Jail, Arizona Department of Corrections, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antowan Ladell Parker v. Raybon Johnson
as 2:2021cv09105
Petitioner:
Antowan Parker
Respondent:
Raybon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
