Cases 61 - 70 of 996
Jo v. Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama et al
as 3:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama , Edmund G. Brown, Jr, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Obama
as 3:2015cv00719
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2015cv01068
Respondent:
Robert A. Barton, Carlos T. Bea, California Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Seavon Pierce
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overton v. Obama
as 3:2015cv00684
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Overton
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2015cv00331
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
U.S. Government and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Petitioner:
Young Yil Jo
Respondent:
Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stoddard v. Seattle Police Department
as 2:2015cv00072
Petitioner:
Harry Clinton Harry Stoddard
Respondent:
Seattle Police Department, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
