Cases 71 - 80 of 155
Clardy v. Reese
as 3:2019cv01132
Defendant:
Michael Reese
Petitioner:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sullivan v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2019cv00995
Defendant:
Matthew Ingram, David Kovachevich, Dr. Michael Seale and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Andrew Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. King County et al
as 2:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sergeant John Doe, Jane Doe Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Johannesen
as 3:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Jullian Carroll, Thomas M. Ryan, Espana and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendleton v. Spokane City of et al
as 2:2018cv00267
Defendant:
Ernest Wuthrich, Spokane City Prosecutors Office, Terri Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie C Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dameion Douglas v. Donald Reese, et al
as 18-35563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMEION DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD REESE, Multnomah County Prosecutor, JOHN DOE, Multnomah County Court Clerk and JOHN DOE
Bridges v. Reese et al
as 3:2018cv01051
Petitioner:
Wayne Jeffrey Bridges
Respondent:
Multnomah County, Oregon Custodian Agent, Sheriff Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley Monical v. Mike Winter, et al
as 17-35813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WINTER, Ex-Sheriff, COREY FALLS, Ex-Sheriff, PENDLAND, Lt. and others
Glenn v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2017cv01576
Plaintiff:
Melree Larea Glenn
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Michelle Reese and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Reese et al
as 3:2017cv01128
Petitioner:
James Ramon Lewis
Respondent:
Sheriff Michael Reese and Capt. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
