Cases 81 - 90 of 194
Khouanmany v. United States Marshals et al
as 2:2017cv01326
Plaintiff:
Vilaychith Khouanmany
Defendant:
United States Marshals, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Caesar (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00806
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mikeal Stine v. L. Milusnic, et al
as 17-55464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
L. J. MILUSNIC, Warden, MDC-LA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, Los Angeles and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, MDC-LA
James v. United States Marshals Service Agents et al
as 3:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kyle James
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service Agents, K. Laney, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrells v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Shannon Sorrells
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Chorrizon Healthcare, Rounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02941
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sorrells v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2015cv01725
Petitioner:
Shannon Sorrells
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taplin v. Multnomah County Health Services et al
as 3:2015cv01937
Defendant:
Dave Brown, Dr. Ole Ersson, Multnomah County Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Dante Lamon Taplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mehmood v. Brennan et al
as 2:2015cv01739
Respondent:
Judge Brennan, AUSA Heiko Cuppola, Judge Dale A. Drozd and others
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richard Pulley v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 2:2015cv06668
Defendant:
Bruce Clark, Bruce Clark, Jack Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Pulley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
