Cases 1 - 10 of 5,033
Stelle III v. Cueva
as 2:2024cv08127
Plaintiff:
Stanford James Stelle III
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sonier v. Singh et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, Field Executive Review Committee, M. Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Markkis Sonier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Bass et al
as 5:2024cv06420
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dominguez
Defendant:
Sgt. M. Taylor, c/o E. Castillo, Sgt. E. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Kotek et al
as 2:2024cv01538
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, Downs, Tina Kotek and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah David Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00416
Defendant:
John Doe Bobiner, T. Valley, Klinton R. Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Klinton R. Hust, Josh Tewalt, T. Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv01591
Defendant:
Does 51-75, Does 1-20 and Does 21-50
Petitioner:
Juan Sanchez
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01638
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Frank Dreesen, James Scally and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02408
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Collins v. Traxinger et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Defendant:
Sidney Woods, Daniel Traxinger and Katie Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Kiven M. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
