Cases 1 - 10 of 4,709
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, L. Lucas, W. Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Slease
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joshua P. Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Slease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Garcia, et al
as 1:2024cv03476
Plaintiff:
Zacharias Daniels
Defendant:
A. Garcia, Sgt. G. Vega, A. Pola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Defendant:
S. Steadman, P. Wingo, B. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario A. Haney v. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Haney
Defendant:
Warden, J. Salcedo, Captain M. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacque Oliphant v. Judge Eric P. Harmon et al
as 2:2024cv04820
Plaintiff:
Jacque Oliphant
Defendant:
Judge Eric P. Harmon, District Attorney Christopher Gray, Probation Officer Herman Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Bonilla v. Judge Erica P. Grosjean
as 2:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Judge Erica P. Grosjean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobo v. People of the State of California
as 3:2024cv03271
Petitioner:
Vincent P Jacobo
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Daniels v. Garcia, et al
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Daniels
Defendant:
A. Garcia, G. Vega, A. Pola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
