Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Woolen v. Ramos et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas Woolen
Defendant:
Ethan Ramos and John Doe Sergeant
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swager v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv00076
Petitioner:
Andrew Thomas Swager
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Earnest #056363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv05690
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Tony Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest #56363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv04226
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neuendorf #147980 v. Greggs et al
as 2:2017cv04036
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant:
Unknown Greggs, Unknown Jones, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claude Thomas, III v. Mark Nooth
as 16-36090
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLAUDE ANDREW THOMAS, III
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH
Orozco #260141 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Luis Felipe Orozco
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2015cv01568
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman # 229191 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01302
Plaintiff:
James Ward Chapman, III
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson #235832 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
Harold Edwin Ferguson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
