Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Teton v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, Wyoming F.W.
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rydon C Teton
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Wyoming F.W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Rocky Mountain Regional Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Regional Detention Facility, Susan Messerly, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teton v. Teton et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Gerrit Teton, U.S. Government, Fort Hall Indian Reservation and others
Plaintiff:
Rydon Clyde Teton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Wind et al
as 1:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Unknown Agents, Bureau of Indian Affairs, John and Jane Does, Donavan Wind and others
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Moore v. United States Bureau of Indian, et al
as 17-17126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY AARON MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, named as: Bureau of Indian Affairs and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: John Doe (1-10) and Jane Doe (1-10)
Moore v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 3:2016cv08261
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. United States et al
as 2:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
United States, Bureau of Indian Affairs, F.B.I. Federal Disposition Reports and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teton v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
as 1:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Rydon C Teton
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teton v. Duncan et al
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Rydon C Teton
Defendant:
Ute Indian Tribe, United States of America, Sho-Ban Tribes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
