Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Spillard v. California Forensic Medical Group Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01407
Defendant:
Ivers, c/o Le Wellean, California Forensic Medical Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Everett L Spillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gordon v. Perez, et al.
as 1:2018cv01498
Defendant:
Pedgrsen, Richardson, Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gordon v. Perez, et al.
as 2:2018cv02897
Defendant:
Pedgrsen, Richardson, Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Wright v. Ken Clark, et al
as 11-17548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND WRIGHT
Defendant:
KEN CLARK, SCOTT KEBAN, J. WARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFLER, FIGUEROA, GONZALEZ and others
Reginald DeJohnette v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 10-17669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD B. DEJOHNETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, MIKE EVANS, N. GRANNIS and others
Jesse Burleson v. Director, California Departmen
as 09-17569
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE CLYDE BURLESON
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Burleson v. AZ Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2009cv00179
Petitioner:
Justin Burleson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Phillip Irby
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DeJohnette v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2008cv05604
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. DeJohnette
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard, Mike Evans, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Karluk Mayweathers v. J. Woodford, et al
as 08-56835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLUK MAYWEATHERS, AKA Karluk Khan Mayweathers
Defendant - Appellee:
J S WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, N GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals, S RYAN, Acting Warden and others
Raymond Wright v. Ken Clark, et al
as 08-15848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, SCOTT KEBAN, J. WARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
