Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Harson Chong v. USA
as 23-55140
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARSON CHONG
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Iokepa Leialoha v. State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, et al
as 22-16430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IOKEPA K. LEIALOHA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, FRED HYUN, KRAMER MAHOE, Cramer Mahoe and others
Warwick v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Warwick
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Betsy Bull and Chong Yim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leialoha v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Iokepa K. Leialoha
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Fred Hyun, Warden Kramer Mahoe and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2020cv00588
Defendant:
Rowley, Mallinger, Chong and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald C. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harson Chong v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv04028
Petitioner:
Harson Chong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tac Tran et al v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv03801
Petitioner:
Harson Chong, Tac Tran and united states
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gadomski v. Houser et al
as 3:2019cv00067
Respondent:
Chong Yim, Kevin Clarkson, Quinlan Stiener and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Gadomski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams #252218 v. Fisk et al
as 2:2018cv01964
Petitioner:
Woodie Leo Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Ronda Fisk, Chong-Ho Chung, Derron Arnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torrence v. Wolverton et al
as 3:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harrold Torrence
Defendant:
Jenna Gruenstein, Marcelle McDannel, Ann B. Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
