Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Christenson v. Warren et al
as 4:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
John J Christenson
Defendant:
Alice Schroder Warren, Jennifer Davie, Able Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafford v. Officer Blackburn et al
as 6:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
James P. Shafford and Jerome P. Shafford
Defendant:
Officer Blackburn, Sgt. McBride, Lt. Christenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christenson v. Tamcke et al
as 6:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Richard John Christenson
Defendant:
Kayla Tamcke, Sgt. Carla Strutzel, D.J. Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grist v. Christenson
as 1:2021cv00086
Respondent:
Christenson
Petitioner:
Harold E Grist, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andoe v. Director Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Director Tewalt, Medi Espinosa Saltzar, IDOC Corizan and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Andoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andoe v. Christenson
as 1:2020cv00579
Respondent:
Christenson
Petitioner:
John R. Andoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Yordy et al
as 1:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Jay Christenson, Corizon LLC, Keith Yordy and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Christenson et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Wally Campbell, Tianna Borgi, Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Pitts v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 18-15652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, LYLE ANTONIO, Chief of Security at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his individual capacity, RUSSEL BOTELHO, Officer at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued individually and others
Christenson v. Eastman
as 6:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Richard Christenson
Defendant:
Mariah Eastman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
