Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Thompson v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2019cv00500
Petitioner:
David Thompson
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Thompson Boyd v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 3:2017cv01896
Petitioner:
David Thompson Boyd
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Superior Court of the State of California
Defendant:
Dean Borders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Unknown
as 2:2017cv00996
Petitioner:
David Thompson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Thompson Boyd v. Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept.
as 2:2015cv06634
Petitioner:
David Thompson Boyd
Respondent:
Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept.
Steven David Thompson v. M D Biter
as 5:2012cv01838
Respondent:
M D Biter
Petitioner:
Steven David Thompson, Sr
Thompson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Thompson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Peter James Little, Jeffrey D Bechtel, Anthony Lee Terranova and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Devon Dickinson and Arizona Correctional Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2010cv00405
Plaintiff:
Stephen Toney
Defendant:
Victor Ruiz, Julie Hyride Marolli, Truong Ta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
