Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, Warden William Gittere, LT. Rigney and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Marks et al
as 3:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Doyle Bingham
Defendant:
Marks, Parks, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. State of Nevada
as 3:2023cv00437
Petitioner:
Brett Doyle
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, O.I.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashby v. Doyle et al
as 3:2023cv02968
Plaintiff:
Defonte Ashby
Defendant:
Robert T. Doyle, Roberto Walton and Beverly Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teas v. State of Alaska et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Teas
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, James Milburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brett Doyle
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Scott Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Supreme Court of the State of Montana
as 2:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Keith Doyle
Respondent:
Supreme Court of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashby v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv07417
Petitioner:
Defonte T. Ashby
Respondent:
Robert T. Doyle
Defendant:
Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
