Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Eaton v. Reese et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Arnold Eaton
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Colette Peters, All Former Directors of The Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Ryan, II v. Jennifer Reiser, et al
as 23-35390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN II
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER REISER, Hearings Officer, MICHAEL HSU, Chairman of the Board of Parole and STEPHANIE LOPEZ, Director of Forensic Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Sciences University: Dr.
Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole Members et al
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Diane Downs
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole Members, Michael Washington, Diane Rea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Reiser et al
as 3:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan, II
Defendant:
Jennifer Reiser, Michael Hsu and Dr. Stephanie Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01266
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Kast et al
as 6:2021cv00183
Respondent:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Marion County Parole & Probation, Sheriff Joe Kast and others
Petitioner:
Geddy Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Halladay v. Hsu et al
as 6:2020cv02015
Defendant:
John Bailey, Patty Cress, Michael Hsu and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey David Halladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil-Barrett v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01896
Defendant:
Collete Peters, Michael Hsu and Kate Brown
Plaintiff:
Liam O'Neil-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Runge et al
as 4:2019cv05158
Defendant:
Eric Hsu, Alex Eckstrom, Bruce Spanner and others
Plaintiff:
John C Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hsu v. Benov
as 1:2011cv01683
Petitioner:
Polo Shu Hsu
Respondent:
Michael L. Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
